NGO
Another Way (Stichting Bakens Verzet), 1018 AM
Edition
04: 30 August, 2010.
Edition
16 :02 August, 2014.
E-course : Diploma in Integrated Development (Dip. Int. Dev)
SECTION A : DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS.
Study value :
04 points out of 18.
Indicative
study time: 112 hours out of 504.
Study points
are awarded only after the consolidated exam for Section A : Development
Problems has been passed.
Second block : The problems to be solved.
Study points : 02 points out
of 18
Expected work required: 55
hours out of 504
The two study points will be
finally awarded on successful completion of the consolidated exam for Section A
: Development problems.
Section 1. Analysis of the Millennium Goals. [22
hours]
[18.00 Hours] Analysis of the
Millennium Goals.
[04.00 Hours] Preparation report Section 1 of Block
2.
[18.00 Hours] Analysis of the
services made available by integrated development projects.
[05.00 Hours]
Preparation report Section 2 of Block 2.
Second block : Exam. [ 4 hours each attempt]
Consolidated exam for Section A : Development problems (for
passage to Section B of the course : [ 6 hours each attempt].
Section
1. Analysis of the Millennium Goals. [22 hours]
[18.00 Hours]
Analysis of the Millennium Goals.
00. Summary of the Millennium
Goals.
01. Eradicate extreme poverty
and hunger.
02. Achieve universal primary
education.
03. Promote gender equality
and empower women.
06. Combat HIV/aids, malaria
and other diseases.
07. Target 09 : Ensure
environmental sustainability.
07. Targets 10 and 11 :
Water, sanitation and slums.
08. Develop a global
partnership for development.
[18.00 Hours]
Analysis of the Millennium Goals.
06. Combat HIV/aids, malaria
and other diseases. (At least 2 hours).
Look at slide: Combat
HIV/aids, malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases.
Millennium
Goal 6 is about HIV/Aids, malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases.
On
health in general review your notes on section 1 of block 1 analysis : health and sanitation and in-depth analysis health and sanitation of the course. See also section 04. Reduce child mortality,
which covers amongst other things the issues of malaria and measles.
For a good general
reference on an integrated approach to health issues refer to Costello A. et
al, Managing the health effects of
climate change, Lancet
(The) Vol. 373, Issue 9676, pp. 1693-1733 with University College London (Institute
for Global Health Commission), London, 2009.
[Registration is required for free access].
The Millennium
Development goals omit any mention of NCDs [non-communicable diseases].
“…the global burden and threat of non-communicable diseases constitutes
one of the major challenges for development in the twenty-first century, which
undermines social and economic development throughout the world, and threatens
the achievement of internationally agreed development goals.” (Paragraph 1 of
the Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and
Control of Non-communicable
Diseases,
Agenda Item 117, Follow up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit, Declaration A/66/L.1,
Yet
non-communicable diseases together cause nearly two out of three deaths in the
world !
“ … according to WHO, in 2008, an estimated 36 million of
the 57 million global deaths were due to non-communicable diseases, principally
cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases and diabetes,
including about 9 million before the age of 60, and that nearly 80 per cent of
those deaths occurred in developing countries ” (Paragraph 14 of the Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and
Control of Non-communicable
Diseases,
Agenda Item 117, Follow up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit, Declaration A/66/L.1, New York, 16 September,
2011.)
For children under
5, the leading non-communicable disease risk factors world-wide in 2010 were
still childhood underweight 12.4% of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs),
non-exclusive or discontinued breast-feeding (7.6%) and household air pollution
from solid fuels (6.3%). For adults world-wide high blood pressure, overweight,
diabetes, alcohol use, and dietary risks have been steadily increasing in
relative importance. (S.Lin et al, A comparative assessment of burden of disease attributable to 67 risk
factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010 : a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, The Lancet, Vol. 380, Issue 9859, pp. 2226-2260,
The UNDP Report on Human Development
for 2007/2008 provides the
following tables :
In connection with
the number of births attended by qualified personnel :
06 Commitment to
health : percentage immunised against tuberculosis and measles; contraceptive prevalence rate.
08 Inequalities in
maternal and child health. : children totally immunised
09. HIV Prevalence;
anti-malaria measures; condom use at
last high-risk sex
Millennium Goal 6
contains 2 targets (HIV/aids, and the other
diseases), and 7 indicators.
1.
Opinion.
On one page, taking into consideration
your earlier work, explain why you think so much attention seems to be
dedicated to this goal.
Millennium goal 6 is
covered in Articles 53-
Article
53 was already discussed in section 04. Reduce child mortality.
It
reads :
“53.
The goals of sustainable development can only be achieved in the absence of a
high prevalence of debilitating diseases, while obtaining health gains for the
whole population requires poverty eradication. There is an urgent need to
address the causes of ill health, including environmental causes, and their
impact on development, with particular emphasis on women and children, as well
as vulnerable groups of society, such as people with disabilities, elderly
persons and indigenous people.”
Paragraphs
b) and g) read:
«(b)
Promote equitable and improved access to affordable and efficient health-care
services, including prevention, at all levels of the health system, essential
and safe drugs at affordable prices, immunization services and safe vaccines
and medical technology;
…
(g)
Target research efforts and apply research results to priority public health
issues, in particular those affecting susceptible and vulnerable populations,
through the development of new vaccines, reducing exposures to health risks,
building on equal access to health-care services, education, training and
medical treatment and technology and addressing the secondary effects of poor
health; “
Paragraph 55 of the
Plan of Implementation of the Millennium Goals refers to
target 7 on HIV/aids :
“55. Implement, within
the agreed time frames, all commitments agreed in the Declaration of Commitment
on HIV/AIDS adopted by the General Assembly at its twenty-sixth
special session, emphasizing in particular the reduction of HIV prevalence
among young men and women aged 15 to 24 by 25 per cent in the most affected
countries by 2005, and globally by 2010, as well as combat malaria,
tuberculosis and other diseases by, inter alia:
(a) Implementing
national preventive and treatment strategies, regional and international cooperation
measures and the development of international initiatives to provide special
assistance to children orphaned by HIV/AIDS;
(b) Fulfilling
commitments for the provision of sufficient resources to support the Global
Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, while promoting access to the
Fund by countries most in need;
(c) Protecting the
health of workers and promoting occupational safety, by, inter alia, taking
into account, as appropriate, the voluntary Code of Practice on HIV/AIDS and
the World of Work of the International Labour Organization, to improve
conditions of the workplace;
(d) Mobilizing
adequate public, and encouraging private, financial resources for research and
development on diseases of the poor, such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis,
directed at biomedical and health research, as well as new vaccine and drug
development. ”
2.
Opinion.
On one
page, describe why, in your opinion, the descriptions of actions
concerning HIV/ aids appear, when compared with the descriptions of other goals
and targets, to be so detailed.
Articles
53 and 55 on their own were apparently not considered sufficient. Section 64
b) of
section VIII of the Plan of Implementation of the Millennium Goals which is more specifically dedicated to
sustainable development in Africa provides :
“(b) Make available
necessary drugs and technology in a sustainable and affordable manner to fight
and control communicable diseases, including HIV/AIDS, malaria and
tuberculosis, and trypanosomiasis, as well as non-communicable diseases,
including those caused by poverty”
“Since 2000, more
than $70 billion of overseas development assistance has been spent for mass
drug treatments and other allied health interventions, such as antimalarial
bednets, health education, and other health system strengthening measures.”
(Hoetz, P. : Millennium Development Goal 6
: Measuring Progress, PLOS Medical Journals’ Blog,
Imported malaria
treatments paid for directly by patients in poverty seriously reduce the
patients’ purchasing power and cause financial leakage from the areas where
they live. Imported medicines paid for by the national government form an
indirect financial leakage from the country and reduce the funds available to
the government to pay for (other) social services. Since anti-malarial
medicines and nets provide protection for a limited period, their supply must
be continued over time with serious, on-going financial leakage as a result.
This causes more poverty rather than reducing it. Furthermore, the more the
medicines distributed, the greater the probability of development of protist
immunity (especially that of Plasmodium Falciparum) to malaria treatment as
described by A. Costello in her contribution Bed Nets for Malaria : Losing
the Arms Race, Public Radio International (PRI), Minneapolis,
July 16, 2103, where she also deals with the very poor quality of the bed nets
supplied by the international aid industry.
Whatever section 64
b) may say in the interests of the pharmaceuticals industry, basic domestic and
local public health measures are therefore the most effective and the cheapest way of fighting many infectious
diseases and malaria in particular. They include removal of stagnant waters,
including water collection in recipients such as flower pots and saucers and
open ditches. The development cycle of mosquitoes varies from five days to a
few weeks depending on the species and the environment. If there is no water
for them to breed in in residential areas, they have to fly in from outlying
areas. Their range of flight can reach a few kilometres depending on the
species, but most types do not go more than a few hundred metres from the point
of breeding, especially where there is not much wind. Several types of fish
will eat mosquito eggs and larvae in stagnant parts of rivers, lakes and water
reserves. Fish species used for this purpose must, however, be native to the area.
Strong
pesticide-free bed nets cannot be locally produced in each integrated
development project area.
These measures are easy
to carry out under the local money systems set up in an early phase of the
execution of integrated development projects, in principle without the need for
any formal money payments in Euros or Dollars at all. That may be why the Plan
of Implementation fails to take account of effective local action to reduce the
number of cases of malaria. Poverty reduction is about reducing the number of
cases, not treating as many of them as possible using imported “drugs and
technologies”.
According to the
World Health Organization, there were 219 million (registered ?) cases of
malaria in 2010, with 660.000 deaths.
Bacteria are already becoming resistant to artesiminin-based combination
therapies (ACTs). “Without an effective alternative treatment, widespread resistance
to both components of ACTs would be disastrous….Further spread of resistant
strains of malaria parasites, or the independent emergence of artesiminin
resistance in other regions [outside the Mekong Delta region[ could jeopardize
all recent gains in malaria control and have major implications for public
health. ” (Antimicrobial Resistance :
Global Report on Surveillance, World Health Organization,
Note that the
foregoing comments are not intended to imply medicines should never be used to
treat malaria !
For enlightening
information on just how this is actually being done, see Audit of USAid/Benin’s Efforts to Treat and Prevent Malaria, Office of the Inspector General, Audit Report
7-680-13-001-P,
The project described is part of the
President’s [George W. Bush] Malaria Initiative which was launched in 2008. For
The summary of results states (on p. 2) :
“In
FY 2011 the mission met its goals as defined in its performance plan report by
purchasing 17,000 malaria treatment kits that were used by public and private
hospitals and by more than 250 health workers. In support of comprehensive
diagnostics, USAID/Benin contributed 600,000 rapid diagnostic tests toward the
3 million total national need, and 509,100 ACTs for uncomplicated malaria
treatment to health facilities……
“…Additionally,
results from
This does not seem to correlate well with the body of
the report.
“All [of its]
1,048 community health workers were trained to treat simple cases of malaria,
diarrhea (sic), and acute respiratory infections in children under 5. However,
only 102 workers were taught how to use diagnostic tests. In 2011 none of the
39,259 suspected cases of malaria treated by the program’s community health
workers were confirmed through diagnostic tests before the administration of
antimalarial medication. This is not surprising since the 102 workers who knew
how to use the tests were trained in January 2012—only 5 months before the
project ended.” (p. 4)
“We were unable to verify any reported results for
BASICS’ [Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival ] malaria-related
activities because neither MSH nor its five subpartners maintained records.”
Of 29259 claimed treatments, 0 were
verified. (p. 5)
“Some health centers do not report their inventory and
consumption levels as required when they ask for more drugs…. inventory and
consumption levels are not reviewed to determine whether the request is
reasonable.” (p. 7)
“At
“In some cases, stock cards were inaccurate.”(p. 8)
“In response to the February 2011 audit—which also discovered that nets
were missing, diverted, or sold for profit—the mission was supposed to improve
its monitoring and perform quarterly site visits. The former commodities
logistics specialist reportedly visited the sites to monitor the project, but
the mission could not provide documentation of these visits.” (p. 8)
“The bags in which the bed nets were packed were not disposed of
promptly… bags are collecting at health centers and could pose health and environmental
risks.”
(p.8)
“Activities Either Started Late or Not at
All.” (p. 9)
“USAID/Benin has not worked intensively with MCDI and partners from the
other projects to ensure that there is adequate collaboration.” (p. 10)
“the government [of Benin] had
not been able to reimburse health centers because it was still putting a system
in place to verify that only expenses for legitimate malaria cases qualified
for reimbursement. The mission was aware of the possible adverse effects of
this policy before it took effect and advised government officials to first
study its implications, but the government did not. Failure to address the
reimbursement problem will hinder PMI goals and jeopardize the program’s
sustainability.” (p. 12)
The amount “spent”
on this part of the anti-malaria campaign in tiny
Report GAO-13-688,
The PEPFAR
definition of programme retention is unbelievable. “Retention, defined as the
percentage of adults and children known to be alive and on treatment 12 months
after starting treatment is used by OGAC and PEPFAR as a proxy for treatment
program quality.” (p. 15) As if most patients with AIDS would not be alive for
those 12 months without treatment anyway. The report continues that 20 of the 23 PEPFAR country teams
provided data on “this” and 10 of those report retention rates at or above 80%,
but even the “data for this indicator are not always complete and have other
limitations.” These limitations include
“differing ways of ascertaining and defining treatment retention; lack of data
for key populations at risk of contracting…. And minimal data on long-term
retention (24 months after starting treatment.” Finally GAO reports, “We
provided a copy of this report [to the agencies involved] for review. We
received limited technical information.”
The fight
against tuberculosis.
“TB is terrifying. According
to the WHO, it is the biggest infectious-disease killer, taking more lives than
AIDS, cholera and other pandemics combined. But we have made matters worse. We
have created Drug Resistant TB by our failure to ensure the complete six months
of treatment. Incomplete and irregular treatment has led to successively
worsening of disease forms, each more deadly than the last…..The EU spent $700
million on TB in one year alone. By 2015, there will be 1.3 million drug resistant
cases, needing $16 billion to treat. 10 million children will be orphaned. In
the next decade, the loss to the world's economy, due to TB in 22 high burden
countries, will be $3.4 trillion. The brunt of the burden will be borne by low
and middle countries… Huge amounts of funds have been poured into a bottomless
pit. Global fund gave $3.8 billion to TB in 2012 alone.
As a last
“supplement”, article 100 of section X the Plan of Implementation of the Millennium Goals, which is about the
“means of implementation” provides :
“100. Address the
public health problems affecting many developing and least developed countries,
especially those resulting from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other
epidemics, while noting the importance of the Doha Declaration on the
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS
Agreement) and public health, in which it was agreed that the TRIPS
Agreement does not and should not prevent WTO members from taking measures to
protect public health. Accordingly, while reiterating our commitment to the
TRIPS Agreement, we reaffirm that the Agreement can and should be interpreted
and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO members' right to protect public
health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.”
“The
declaration on the TRIPS agreement and public health” was adopted in
In
practice amendment ADIPC WT/L/641 makes
it possible for poor countries to import pharmaceutical products made under
licence in other countries (
3.
Opinion.
On two pages write a dialogue between the
manager international affairs of a pharmaceuticals multinational with a partner
producing medicines under licence in
In
respect of HIV/aids, women are believed
to make up half of the people suffering from HIV/aids.
“Because
most men who buy sex either are married or will get married, significant
numbers of ostensibly ‘low-risk’ women who only have sex with their husbands
are exposed to HIV.” (p. 112)
“Women's
risk of exposure to HIV/AIDS is increased by poverty, poor nutrition, low
levels of education, illiteracy, lack of information on HIV/AIDS, lack of
knowledge about sexuality and inability to discuss it with sexual partners, and
lack of empowerment among women in general and sex workers in particular to
negotiate safe sex with partners and clients. “ (p. 121)
“The
majority of primary caregivers are women, including girls and grandmothers. The
physical burden of care is so heavy that it leaves little time or energy for
economic activity to provide a livelihood for the family.” (p.123)
Malaria.
Each
year, some 50.000.000 women get pregnant in areas where malaria is endemic.
Half of them live in tropical
Tuberculosis.
"In
Dominating
social structures often make it difficult for women to get access to medical
centres.
4.
Opinion.
On one page, try to organise three columns,
one for HIV/aids, one for malaria, and one for tuberculosis. In each column
list local actions you think could be taken in your project area to
substantially reduce the number of cases of death due to HIV/aids, malaria, and
tuberculosis.
◄ Second block : Problems to be solved.
◄ Index : Diploma in Integrated Development (Dip. Int. Dev)